Equal authorship for equal authors: personal experience as an equal author in twenty peer-reviewed medical publications during the last three years.
نویسنده
چکیده
To the editor, Authors’ contributions to medical publications are semi-quantitatively assessed by order of authorship, with earlier listed authors generally having increasingly important contributions. Standard medical indexes, such as PubMed or MEDLINE, uniformly list authors of publications in peer-reviewed journals sequentially, without provision for designating equal authorship for equal contributors. This omission can discriminate against the second of equal authors, who is viewed as a lesser contributing author. This letter analyzes this problem and proposes an equitable solution, based on personal experience with twenty publications during the last three years. This work received an exemption/approval by the William Beaumont Hospital Institutional Review Board on January 11, 2016.
منابع مشابه
Misused honorary authorship is no excuse for quantifying the unquantifiable.
Kovacs argues that honorary authorship and regarding each co-author of multi-authored papers as if they were sole authors when the performance of researchers is being evaluated by their publications mean that we should require authors to identify what proportion of each publication should be attributed to each co-author. Even if such attributions could be made reliably, such a change should not...
متن کاملMapping the Scientific Structure of Iranian Brucellosis Researches Using the Co-authorship and Co-occurrence Network Analysis
Background and Objective: The evaluation of the publishing trend of articles in various scientific fields provides an insight into the efforts of researchers in the field of knowledge. Accordingly, the present study has evaluated and analyzed the scientific publications on brucellosis conducted by Iranian researchers using scientometrics methods and analysis of social networks. Methods: The pr...
متن کاملA Bibliometric Analysis of Toxicology Publications of Iran and Turkey in ISI Web of Science
Background: Web of Science (WoS) is an online academic citation index provided by Thomson Reuters which supplies valuable bibliometric information for comparing impact of specific author, organization, or country in science production. The aim of this study was to compare toxicology publications of Iran and Turkey indexed in WoS from bibliometric point of view. Methods: The WoS database was ...
متن کامل“Editorial Letter” Managing Authorship Conflicts: A Guide for Researchers
Nowadays, the issue of Authorship has increasingly expanded in the academic world and has resulted in a lot of problems for scholars and the editorial board of scientific Journals. Given the increasing number of postgraduate students and subsequent research activities, every day we witness the formal and informal arguments on the ambiguity and unfairness of decisions regarding authors' names an...
متن کاملEqual Contributions and Credit: An Emerging Trend in the Characterization of Authorship in Major Anaesthesia Journals during a 10-Yr Period
BACKGROUND The practice of giving certain authors equal credit in original research publications was increasingly common in some specialty. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of designating some authors with equally credited authors (ECAs) in major anaesthesia journals. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS The practice of giving authors equal credit was searched and ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
دوره 104 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016